My Blog List
Sponser Link
know more info pls click here
Can you have a try block without a catch or a finally block?-interview04032012
No, you cannot have a try block without a catch or a finally block. A try block cannot exist in isolation. A try block should be followed by either a catch block or a finally block or both.
Is the following code legal?
try
{
Response.Write("Try block executed");
}
finally
{
Response.Write("Finally block executed");
}
Yes, it's legal. A try statement does not have to have a catch statement if it has a finally statement.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
<div id="editable" contenteditable="true"> text text text<br> text text text<br> text text...
-
1. Use exception-handling structures to deal with exceptions within the scope of a procedure. This technique is called structured exception ...
-
The Trace object provides the Write and Warn methods to allow you to write messages to a request’s trace information. The two methods are id...
-
There is a little tool called JSPExecutor that allows you to do just that. The developers (Hendrik Schreiber <hs@webapp.de> & Pet...
-
Let me explain the process; 1. First you should go to your adsense account and grab the code for your adsense ads. 2. For this you sh...
-
Few know that those who have web hosting are at the same time endowed with a free VPN (Virtual Private Network, a very safe connection to t...
-
There are a number of ways to get information about a particular Linux command. Chances are you are using bash shell which is currently the...
-
To check if a URL or an email address is valid, the common solution is regular expressions. For instance, to validate an email address in P...
-
we are running a classified site and the latest ads which are coming to the system is indexed in solr write server in every three minutes. T...
-
open source Apache webserver is well-proven, but can still offer an administrator headaches from timeto time when things don't go quite ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment